ARTH/ASN
103. Introduction to Asian Art. Fall 2016.
|
Professor Lara Blanchard |
tel: x3893
|
Art & Architecture Department, 208 Houghton House |
Looking paper.Your first paper for this course will be based on your analysis of a single Asian painting, chosen from several that I have posted on Canvas. The assignment pages for the Looking Paper will have links to these paintings. Alternatively, you can access them through Files, within the folder labeled “Images for Looking Paper.” (Look at the file names to tell which image is which.) I have posted these seven paintings:
Choose one painting from the list above to analyze. This is supposed to be a "looking" paper, by which I mean that I don't want you to do extensive research or background reading. I want you to look at the painting and analyze it based on what you see. Sylvan Barnet's A Short Guide to Writing about Art (11th ed.) refers to this kind of assignment as an "analysis," and Chapters 3 (“Formal Analysis and Style”) and 4 (“Analytical Thinking”) explain specifically how to write this kind of paper. I expect you to read those chapters carefully, paying special attention to the section titled “Drawing and Painting.” * Please note that Chapters 1 (“Writing about Art”), 2 (“Writing about Art: The Big Picture”), 9 (“How to Write an Effective Essay”), and 10 (“Style in Writing”) may also be useful. The finished paper should be about 600-900 words long (roughly 2-3 pages), but it is due in three parts. First draft (due Friday, Sept. 9): Write a careful description of the painting, making sure to identify which painting it is. This part should be about 300-600 words (roughly 1-2 pages). You should describe the subject matter of the painting, and you should also use what we have learned about formal characteristics of art in this part of the paper. These potentially include the following (remember that the absence of certain characteristics is sometimes important too):
Second draft (due Wednesday, Sept. 21): Take the description you wrote for the first draft and start to revise it in order to include your analysis of the painter's artistic choices in regard to media, composition, proportion or scale, color, line, space/mass/volume, and vantage point. (A great artist paints thoughtfully, and his or her choices are deliberate. Consider how the painting could have been different. Then consider what the artist's choices convey to the viewer.) After you have come up with ideas about why the artist painted this particular work in a certain way, use those ideas to develop a specific thesis around which to organize your writing, and put the thesis in the first paragraph. (Note: this should not be an inflated claim such as “This painting exemplifies the beauty of Chinese art,” nor should it be something so vague that it could apply to many paintings, such as “This painting exhibits the formal characteristics of composition, line, and color.”) Please avoid judgment: I am not looking for an assessment or a critique of whether the works of art are good or bad, but an argument about what you think the painter is trying to convey. Your draft at this point should have grown by another 300-600 words, making it roughly 600-900 words or 2-3 pages altogether. It is not necessary or even desirable to keep the first and second drafts separate; ideally, the writing you do for the second draft should be integrated into your first draft. Final draft (due Monday, Oct. 3): Revise your second draft as necessary, incorporating any suggestions that other readers or I made on earlier drafts. (It is possible that your second draft will not need further revision and can be resubmitted as the final draft.) Ideally, the final draft should include an introductory paragraph with a thesis that explains what you think the artist is trying to convey about the subject, multiple body paragraphs (with clear topic sentences) that focus on a single idea that supports your argument, and a concluding paragraph that reiterates your thesis and your findings. If you have further questions about writing papers, you might visit the HWS Writes website (http://www.hws.edu/academics/ctl/hws_writes.aspx). Breakdown of grades for looking paper (percentage of final course grade): Format for written work:
You can submit written work via Canvas. Please upload a Microsoft Word document (.doc, .docx), Rich Text Format file (.rtf), or a PDF file (.pdf): these are the only formats that Canvas will accept. Alternatively, you can turn in a stapled hard copy, plus copies of any earlier drafts, during the class period. PLEASE NOTE: I do not accept papers via e-mail.
A note about cheating and plagiarism: Now, just in case you are not clear about what plagiarism is: plagiarism is the use of someone else’s words or ideas without giving that person credit. In application, this means that in your writing assignments, you need to cite your sources. When quoting directly from a text—say, five words or more in succession—you need to put those words in quotation marks and include a parenthetical reference or footnote citing the source. When rewriting a passage from a text in your own words, you don’t need the quotation marks but you do still need the parenthetical reference or footnote. In addition, all sources that you cite need to be included in a list of works cited at the end of the assignment. If you don’t understand exactly what constitutes plagiarism, or how to use parenthetical references or footnotes, please ask me. I would prefer to explain what it is and how to avoid it before it happens rather than after. * If you have the 9th edition of A Short Guide to Writing about Art, read Chapter 3, “Analytic Thinking” (pp. 47-112, especially the sections "Drawing and Painting"); and Chapter 4, “Formal Analysis and Style" (pp. 113-34). If you have the 10th edition, read Chapter 3, “Formal Analysis and Style,” and Chapter 4, “Analytic Thinking.”
|