Plans are afoot to link
BlackBoard with mobile phones like BlackBerry. The notorious CrackBerry may finally be used to promote something beside e-mail and sms addiction.
Personally, I am not opposed to having students access coursework on any platform they prefer, from a desktop to a cellphone. I remember editing and reviewing my dissertation on an old Palm Pilot while taking the bus everyday when I was in graduate school. So I hardly have any issues with students working when, how, and where they want.
Even if I had an objection, it would be useless since web surfing technology is already a feature on most new mobile phones.
However, if this integrated link between proprietary courseware and mobile technology becomes a monopoly, it may pose some serious challenges to those of us who prefer to minimize their reliance on proprietary courseware and software. At the moment, it is relatively easy to set up blogs for mobile telephone downloading (it is a standard feature even for free sites like Blogger), but it is significantly more challenging and time-consuming to design an entire course that can be readily viewed on multiple platforms. However, Twitter software can easily be used to replicate some of the SMS features promised by the newly integrated proprietary courseware.
Of course, Blackboard is trying not only to make their courseware interface with mobile phones, they are also marketing a link with their point-of-sale systems. One can envision a situation in the not too distant future in which students use their Tablet PC or Blackberry's to logon to the course, purchase and download their readings in digital format during a class session. Of course, I am not completely sure how all of this will work, but it does seem to be blurring a line between providing educational content and establishing a monopoly in the business of education.
The original reasons that I gave up on WebCT and BlackBoard is that their products are clumsy, ugly, costly, and slow compared to what I could make myself. In fact, I don't see why any college should pay for this service when almost any professor could make smoother, better, cheaper and faster sites themselves (... one of the aims of the posts on this blog is to encourage exactly this). Proprietary courseware systems encourage dependence on technology instead of selective and thoughtful appropriation of technology. The philosophy that guides proprietary course management software is inappropriate to my personal outlook on teaching and that of many other academics. Professors should have the option and the ability to make as much of their courses available to the general public as they please. Finally, students and professors should have the ability to prevent corporations from monopolizing the commercial aspects of academic interaction.
The more that professors use proprietary courseware, the less ability they have to control how much of their intellectual labor they can liberate. Corporations which aim to establish a monopoly in the businesss of education benefit from the practice of exclusive and password protected on-line course content. Resisting the emergence of a corporate monopoly and maintaining academic freedom therefore requires academics to maintain ownership of the means of intellectual production.Labels: open source, teaching, technology, web technology