Well, the semester is over, grades are posted, and I am starting to evaluate whether or not I want to use a course blog again next term. My course blog (
vyadav.wordpress.org) was designed mainly to point students to news articles related to course readings.
Pointer BlogThe main goals of the blog were to encourage students to engage current events and to develop a habit of reading newspapers of record (e.g., the
New York Times,
Washington Post,
Financial Times) instead of headline oriented sites (e.g. CNN, BBC). Students were encouraged to try to apply their theoretical readings to current events. The blog also served as a forum for students to discuss their reaction to current events. I ask my students not to use first person arguments in their short reaction papers and exams, so the blog was a venue where opinions were permitted and welcomed. I had hoped that quieter students would be encouraged to engage the course and become encouraged to participate in class on the basis of their on-line participation. Similarly, more engaged students could use the blog to explore topics not fully covered in the classroom.
The stimulus for students to post varied by class. In the introductory course, students were given points based on the mean number of posts (with the mean standing in for a "C"). There were also five quizzes and five reaction papers which asked students to apply theories to contemporary events based at least in part on news items linked from the blog posts. In the seminar, students were required to submit five substantial posts of at least one full page in length. Seminar students who posted shorter posts were given extra credit points.
I am still waiting to see the student evaluations but my hunch is that several students did not like the blog assignment. A large number of the intro students waited until nearly the end of the term before really engaging with the articles linked by the blog. I still think there was some value added, but my hope had been that the blog articles would work to stimulate more vigorous in-class discussions.
My general sense is that the blog works much better than just telling students to get a newspaper subscription (which is how my professors used to incorporate current events). Students seem to want to be pointed toward specific articles, particularly at the Introductory level. In my seminar, the students requested that I add links to specific items they had read on line and wanted to comment on.
WikiAn alternative to using a "pointer blog" is to create a class wiki. A wiki, if you haven't heard, is a collaborative on-line document. I think of a blog as a either a medium which broadcasts from one/few to many; or which allows an individual to point readers to other sites. A wiki is a medium which seeks to bring many authors together to create a single, relatively stable product. A group blog can simulate a wiki, but a group blog is oriented toward freqent posting of new items, whereas a wiki generates relatively stable pages which will have minor edits over time.
I used class wikis at
Mount Holyoke with some success. The wiki project mainly involved asking students to create their own class glossary for complex terms from the assigned readings. The software for the program was part of the open source (
Sakai)
courseware used by Mount Holyoke. If one does not have a wiki option in their courseware, then
Google Docs (see
previous post) can be used to achieve the same essential objectives.
The assignment worked best in my political economy seminar on "Developmental States," but there were also very positive results in my "Global Poverty and Property" class. I think the number of terms that students have to master for an upper level political economy seminar makes the idea of a collaborative glossary appealing.
The assignment design that I used was to break the students into groups for each term. In one class, I first assigned one term to a single student, the next week I assigned a new term to groups of two students; the following week I assigned a new term to a group of three students, etc... The gradual approach worked reasonably well in acclimating students to the demands of collaborative on-line assignments. The main issue in designing the assignment was avoiding the free-rider problem. Of course, since it is possible to view each student's edits in the wiki, it is rather evident who did what to contribute if the students all collaborate from separate locations.
Students were also asked to list a few key pages from the reading where the term is used and to provide anecdotes in plain english to make the definitions clear. The reason for this was to discourage students from basically mimicing a definition from Wikipedia or another on-line source. As entries were finalized, I would send e-mails asking for additional details if needed.
All terms had to be complete either one or two days before the actual class session -- so that students could use the glossary while doing their readings for the class. Since the end product is displayed to the entire class, edited by the professor, and used by classmates to study for exams, the quality of the work was impressive. Some students even added photos, charts, equations, etc.
Of course, the demands on the professor's time is rather intense, so it is a daunting undertaking. I don't believe in just using technology for the sake of it, but it might be a useful exercise in my "
Politics of Development" course next term, because that course requires students to master a wide range of terms and concepts in order to engage the broader developmental discourse.
Labels: blog, teaching, web technology, wiki