Math 448: Complex Analysis

Offered:    Spring 1998
Instructor: Kevin J. Mitchell
Time:       Class: M-W-F 1:20 to 2:30 in Napier 201                          
Text:       Complex Variables with Applications by Brown & Churchill

About Math 448

In Math 331 you saw how mathematicians were led to construct the real number system because certain elementary problems had "solutions'' that were not rational numbers. For example, the length x of the diagonal of a unit square cannot be expressed as a rational number, since by the Pythagorean theorem, we must have x^2 - 2 = 0. But you proved that the square root of 2 is not rational. Such quantities, which arose in the most elementary physical way, could not be ignored, even if they could not be adequately described or defined. Thus some level of acceptance of irrational numbers existed even before Dedekind's work in the nineteenth century.

Even more fundamental for European mathematicians was the problem of negative numbers. It was not until the seventeenth centurythat negative numbers became known in Europe through Arab texts, though the Hindus had used them as early as the seventh century. Why were negative numbers problematic? Consider this argument given by Antoine Arnauld (1612--1694). We wish to claim that -1:1 = 1:-1. Of course -1 is less than 1. How can a smaller number be related to a larger one in the same way that a larger number is related to a smaller one?

Without quite understanding negative or irrational numbers, mathematicians began to struggle with what we now call complex or imaginary numbers. Again the motivation was a search for solutions. The quadratic equation x^2 - 2 = 0 at least has irrational solutions, but the equally simple equation x^2 + 1 = 0 has no real solutions, rational or irrational. This fact follows directly from the axiom system for real numbers which guarantees that for any real number x, we have x^2 is non-negative. But then x^2 + 1 > 0. That is, no real number x satisfies x^2 + 1 = 0.

As early as the sixteenth century mathematicians began to explore the properties of nonreal solutions to quadratic equations. The symbol i was used to denote the "imaginary'' solutions of x^2 + 1 = 0. Acting as if the usual algebraic laws were valid here, mathematicians such as Jerome Cardan (1501--1576) began to use square roots of negative numbers to solve all sorts of "impossible'' problems. In his Ars Magna of 1545 Cardan poses the following problem. Find two numbers whose sum is 10 and whose product is 40. Of course, this requires us to find solutions to the quadratic equation x(10 - x) = 40, or equivalently, x^2 - 10x + 40 = 0. Using elementary calculus, the quadratic x^2 - 10x + 40 has an absolute minimum of 15 at x = 5, as long as x is constrained to be a real number. Therefore, no real solutions to this problem exist. Cardan was not deterred, however, and he obtained the nonreal "solutions'' that we today would denote by 5 + sqrt(-15) and 5 - sqrt(-15), that is, 5 + sqrt(15)i and 5 - sqrt(15)i. You can verify that Cardan's answers are correct, acting on faith that the usual laws of algebra apply to such quantities.

Cardan and others at this time operated without any careful or formal theory of complex numbers by blindly applying the ordinary rules of algebra as needed. But some mathematicians completely rejected the notion of such "imaginary'' solutions to equations. Felix Klein wrote:

Imaginary numbers made their way into arithmetic calculation without the approval, and even against the desires of individual mathematicians, and obtained wider circulation only gradually and to the extent they showed themselves useful. Imaginary numbers long retained a somewhat it mystic coloring.... As evidence, I mention a very significant utterance by Leibniz in the year 1702, "Imaginary numbers are a fine and wonderful refuge of the divine spirit, almost amphibian between being and non-being."
Our immediate goal is to make precise the nature of the complex number system and its rules of algebra. This will be followed by developing a calculus that employs the complex numbers which is analogous in many ways to the calculus developed in Math 331, but with some interesting and beautiful differences.

Expectations and Assessment

To be successful in this course, and more importantly to come to appreciate the beauty of complex analysis, will require substantial effort . I expect that you will spend five or more hours of work on your own for each hour of class time. We will make use of relevant material from previous courses, especially Math 331, Math 204, and calculus. We will not have time to cover every proof in the text, so carefully read the material and ask questions when you are confused.

Below, I have outlined the readings for the term. I hope that we can stick this schedule, as the material on residues is a fitting place for the course to end. I will assign practice problems out of the text. I have an Answer Manual for the text and you are welcome to use it. The main component of your grade for the course will be a series of 12 to 15 graded homework assignments. While you may discuss this work with classmates, I expect that the work you hand in will be your own. The graded homework assignments will contain both routine and more challenging problems which extend the material we are discussing in class. I don't expect that you will be able to "solve" every problem. There will be two out-of-class self-scheduled exams. You will have 90 minutes to work on these exams at a time during the day when it is convenient for you. There will also be a final exam.

Your course grade will be calculated as follows: Homework 45%, 2 Tests 15% each, Final Exam 15%, and Class Participation 10%. Because of the nature of this course, its assignments, and its assessment, your attendance and participation is both crucial and required. If you must miss a class for some reason beyond your control, talk to me about it in advance.


Office Hours

My office is Lansing 305. My extension is 3619. My e-mail address is mitchell. Scheduled office hours are:
    M & F 11:00 to 12:00     T & T   11:45 to 12:45
I am often in my office much of the day; drop in to get hints or help with course assignments or just to chat.

Outline of Weekly Readings